• Home
  • Articles
  • Bio
  • Law

Cervantes

News, Law, Politics, Science, Health, Literature…

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« New Search Tool Aims at Answering Tough Queries, but Not at Taking on Google
Good to the last drop »

More fuzzy math on jobs?

May 11, 2009 by ab

Critics — including many Republicans and some economists — have questioned President Obama’s assertion that the economic stimulus package will create or save 3.5 million jobs.

It is exceedingly difficult, they note, to prove that a job was “saved.” “If we lose over a million jobs since the stimulus passed, the administration can still claim to save 150,000. ‘Save’ is a communications department’s greatest ‘saving grace,” the office of House GOP whip Eric Cantor said in an email today.

The skeptics are sure to have a field day with the new report from the president’s Council of Economic Advisers that revises the estimate of job creation from the $787 billion stimulus package.

Besides repeating the 3.5 million jobs figure as of the fourth quarter of 2010, the report introduces a new number — 6.8 million “job-years” saved or created hrough the end of 2012.

“For some purposes, looking at the effects at a single point in time is not the most useful approach,” the report says. “Since the economy is likely to be operating below capacity for several years, job creation at any time over the next several years is valuable.

“Thus, a second way to look at the employment effects of the program is to estimate the number of job-years the program will create over the President’s first term. A job-year means simply one job for one year.”

The job-years include “direct jobs” created by government-sponsored projects, “indirect jobs” created at suppliers who make materials used in projects, and “induced jobs” created elsewhere in the economy from increased spending by workers and companies.

Americans for Tax Reform, a group critical of Obama, noted that federal statistics show 1.9 million jobs lost since Obama took office.

“Obama and his economic advisors have resorted to the invention of highly questionable new metrics such as the number of ”saved’ jobs and – making its debut today — the number of ‘job-years’ created,” the group said today.

It cited Senator Max Baucus, chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, responding to Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner during a hearing: “You created a situation where you cannot be wrong. If the economy loses 2 million jobs over the next few years, you can say yes, but it would’ve lost 5.5 million jobs. If we create a million jobs, you can say, well, it would have lost 2.5 million jobs. You’ve given yourself complete leverage where you cannot be wrong, because you can take any scenario and make yourself look correct.”

__________

See also:

Estimates of job creation from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009

 http://www.whitehouse.gov/assets/documents/Job-Years_Revised5-8.pdf

__________

Full article: http://www.boston.com/news/politics/politicalintelligence/2009/05/more_fuzzy_math.html

About these ads

Like this:

Like Loading...

Posted in Economy and business, Language, Mathematics, Politics |

  • Recent Posts

    • Poem of the week: Autumn at Taos by DH Lawrence
    • Teaching Good Sex
    • Neutrino experiment repeat at Cern finds same result
    • This Is a … Oh, Never Mind
    • When Heaven Freezes Over
    • Into Thin Air
    • Poem of the week: Trenches: St Eloi by TE Hulme
    • Ten of the best sentences as titles
    • Poem of the week: Square One by Roddy Lumsden
    • Readmill Networks Lonely Bookworms
    • Salt of the Earth
    • ‘Berlusconi Is a Joke, Behind Him Is a Void’
    • Dutch Scientists Drive Single-Molecule Car
    • Poem of the week: Stone by Janet Simon
    • Poem of the week: Tiny Pieces by Billy Mills
  • Pages

    • Articles
      • Entertainment
        • - Pearls Before Breakfast
      • Newspapers
        • - How to read a column
      • Photo Galleries
      • Poetry
      • Strange but True
      • This Day in History
    • Bio
    • Law
      • - Constitutional Law
        • - The Queen becomes a kingmaker if no party is overall winner
      • - Contracts
      • - Criminal law
      • - Criminal procedure
      • - Evidence
      • - International law
        • - The Many Sources Governing Warfare
        • - The Nuremberg Judgment
      • - Legal dictionary
        • - Common law in French
        • - Parliament
      • - London Times
        • - One hundred cases that changed Britain
        • - Questions that have changed the course of criminal and civil trials
        • - Ten amazing courtroom scenes
        • - Ten literary classics
        • - The 10 most shocking jury indiscretions
        • - The Queen’s Privy Council
        • - The weirdest legal cases
        • - The weirdest legal cases of 2008
        • - The world’s strangest laws
      • - Others
        • - ABA Journal Blawg 100 (2007)
        • - ABA Journal Blawg 100 (2008)
        • - Cracking the Spine of Libel
        • - Decline is a choice
        • - Defending (some) sex offenders
        • - Fatwa Overload
        • - Free to Offend
        • - How to Build a Better Law Blog
        • - Let’s kill all the lawyers (Shakespeare)
        • - Mortimer Rests His Case
        • - Politics and the English Language (George Orwell)
        • - The Potato and the Law
        • - The Trouble with Military Tribunals
        • - Tips for Writing a Successful Legal Blog
        • - What’s a Liberal Justice Now?
        • - Why People Believe in Conspiracies
      • - Property
      • - Torts
      • - Trusts and estates
  • Categories

    • Animals
    • Arts
    • Arts and Entertainment
    • Biological sciences
    • Birds of America
    • Computers
    • Conflicts and wars
    • Economy and business
    • Editorials and opinion
    • Energy and Environment
    • Entertainment
    • Entertainment Today
    • French
    • German
    • Health
    • History
    • Human rights
    • Italian
    • Language
    • Law
    • Literature
    • Living
    • Mathematics
    • Media
    • Natural sciences
    • Notable and quotable
    • On Language
    • Other
    • Pepper and salt
    • Photo galleries
    • Physical sciences
    • Poetry
    • Politics
    • Popular culture
    • Practical advice
    • Religion
    • Social sciences
    • Space
    • Spanish
    • Strange but true
    • Summer Thrillers
    • Supreme Court decisions
    • The Ink Tank
    • The Week ahead
    • The Word
    • This day in history
    • Today's Papers
    • Travel and Transportation
    • Uncommon knowledge
    • Weird cases

Blog at WordPress.com.

Theme: MistyLook by WPThemes.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Powered by WordPress.com
%d bloggers like this: