• Home
  • Articles
  • Bio
  • Law

Cervantes

News, Law, Politics, Science, Health, Literature…

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« Stephen Hawking Hospitalized
Obama Orders Cabinet to Cut $100 Million From Budgets »

Why Do We Avoid Advance Directives?

April 20, 2009 by ab

When I visit my father, I make a point of checking: Is that battered leather folder full of legal documents sitting in its usual spot in the den?

At 86, Dad is managing quite nicely in his own apartment. But the day will likely come when he’ll face choices about how much medical treatment to undergo, and he may be too incapacitated to make or express such decisions. It could happen in 10 years or next week; whenever it is, I want to be able to lay hands on one of those documents, called an advance directive for health care. In it, he authorizes me “to make decisions in my best interest, based upon what is known of my wishes.”

We’ve had a number of conversations about those wishes, he and I. Nevertheless, the document goes on to specify what my father doesn’t want (no C.P.R., ventilator or feeding tube) and what he does want (pain relief) in the event that he becomes “permanently unconscious” or is diagnosed with “an incurable and irreversible illness” that two doctors deem terminal. Nothing on paper can make such a moment less than wrenching, but the lack of something in writing can make it much, much worse.

It’s startling how few Americans have advance directives, an umbrella term including living wills that state your wishes and health care proxies that designate someone to carry them out if you can’t. A Pew Research Center survey in 2006 found that only 29 percent of people had a living will; in 2007, a Harris Interactive study  put the proportion with advance directives at two in five. Even among “severely or terminally ill patients,” the majority had no advance directives in their medical records, researchers for the federal Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality reported a few years ago.

That can put both physicians and families in an awful bind. If a terminally ill parent lands in a hospital and daughter A tells the staff no, no feeding tube, will daughter B accuse her of killing their mother? If daughter B tells the staff to go ahead and turn on a respirator, will son C argue that no, after the Terry Schiavo case in Florida, their mother declared she never wanted to be kept alive by machines? Sometimes, a hospital ethics committee has to get involved. Sometimes, courts and lawyers do.

“It gets so emotional,” said Ronda Hughes, co-author of the A.H.R.Q. report. A onetime cardiac critical care nurse in Boston, she’s seen “people crying, screaming, threatening.”

“When you’re faced with those decisions, you can’t say, ‘Let me get back to you in a week,’” she said.

If only the patient had left clear instructions!

So why don’t we?

One reason is that advance directives may be misperceived, theorized Nathan Kottkamp, a health care attorney in Richmond, Va., and organizer of this month’s National Healthcare Decisions Day. People may equate such documents with limiting care, with “pulling the plug.” In fact, Mr. Kottkamp said, “Your living will can say you want every medical treatment known to science applied to you at the end of life. Or no treatment. Or anywhere on that spectrum.”

Maybe people may think drafting an advance directive is complicated and expensive and requires a lawyer. But forms for every state (state laws regarding advance directives differ) are widely available on the Internet, at the National Hospice and Palliative Care Organization’s Web site or through the National Healthcare Decision Day site, among others. An advance health care directive doesn’t have to cost more than a couple of bucks for a notary.

People can have dreadful accidents or face incurable illness at any age, of course. Ms. Hughes, after she finished the A.H.R.Q. study, promptly drafted a highly specific advance directive for herself. She’s 42. But most Americans die not suddenly, but of chronic diseases associated with aging. So I’m grateful that my father has an advance directive. As I steam towards 60, I have one myself.

The sad fact is that even with an advance directive, your designated decision-maker may still face a fight in trying to follow your instructions. It’s not uncommon for doctors to disagree with a family about what should be done; it’s not uncommon for family members to disagree — sharply and painfully — with one another. But, as Mr. Kottkamp said, “It’s an uglier fight if you don’t have the documents.”

I hope my daughter is up for the battle, should one arise. At least, I tell myself, I’ve given her the ammo.

Paula Span is the author of “When the Time Comes: Families With Aging Parents Share Their Struggles and Solutions.”

__________

Full article: http://newoldage.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/04/20/why-do-we-avoid-advance-directives/?hp

About these ads

Like this:

Like Loading...

Posted in Editorials and opinion, Law, Living | Tagged Advance directives |

  • Recent Posts

    • Poem of the week: Autumn at Taos by DH Lawrence
    • Teaching Good Sex
    • Neutrino experiment repeat at Cern finds same result
    • This Is a … Oh, Never Mind
    • When Heaven Freezes Over
    • Into Thin Air
    • Poem of the week: Trenches: St Eloi by TE Hulme
    • Ten of the best sentences as titles
    • Poem of the week: Square One by Roddy Lumsden
    • Readmill Networks Lonely Bookworms
    • Salt of the Earth
    • ‘Berlusconi Is a Joke, Behind Him Is a Void’
    • Dutch Scientists Drive Single-Molecule Car
    • Poem of the week: Stone by Janet Simon
    • Poem of the week: Tiny Pieces by Billy Mills
  • Pages

    • Articles
      • Entertainment
        • - Pearls Before Breakfast
      • Newspapers
        • - How to read a column
      • Photo Galleries
      • Poetry
      • Strange but True
      • This Day in History
    • Bio
    • Law
      • - Constitutional Law
        • - The Queen becomes a kingmaker if no party is overall winner
      • - Contracts
      • - Criminal law
      • - Criminal procedure
      • - Evidence
      • - International law
        • - The Many Sources Governing Warfare
        • - The Nuremberg Judgment
      • - Legal dictionary
        • - Common law in French
        • - Parliament
      • - London Times
        • - One hundred cases that changed Britain
        • - Questions that have changed the course of criminal and civil trials
        • - Ten amazing courtroom scenes
        • - Ten literary classics
        • - The 10 most shocking jury indiscretions
        • - The Queen’s Privy Council
        • - The weirdest legal cases
        • - The weirdest legal cases of 2008
        • - The world’s strangest laws
      • - Others
        • - ABA Journal Blawg 100 (2007)
        • - ABA Journal Blawg 100 (2008)
        • - Cracking the Spine of Libel
        • - Decline is a choice
        • - Defending (some) sex offenders
        • - Fatwa Overload
        • - Free to Offend
        • - How to Build a Better Law Blog
        • - Let’s kill all the lawyers (Shakespeare)
        • - Mortimer Rests His Case
        • - Politics and the English Language (George Orwell)
        • - The Potato and the Law
        • - The Trouble with Military Tribunals
        • - Tips for Writing a Successful Legal Blog
        • - What’s a Liberal Justice Now?
        • - Why People Believe in Conspiracies
      • - Property
      • - Torts
      • - Trusts and estates
  • Categories

    • Animals
    • Arts
    • Arts and Entertainment
    • Biological sciences
    • Birds of America
    • Computers
    • Conflicts and wars
    • Economy and business
    • Editorials and opinion
    • Energy and Environment
    • Entertainment
    • Entertainment Today
    • French
    • German
    • Health
    • History
    • Human rights
    • Italian
    • Language
    • Law
    • Literature
    • Living
    • Mathematics
    • Media
    • Natural sciences
    • Notable and quotable
    • On Language
    • Other
    • Pepper and salt
    • Photo galleries
    • Physical sciences
    • Poetry
    • Politics
    • Popular culture
    • Practical advice
    • Religion
    • Social sciences
    • Space
    • Spanish
    • Strange but true
    • Summer Thrillers
    • Supreme Court decisions
    • The Ink Tank
    • The Week ahead
    • The Word
    • This day in history
    • Today's Papers
    • Travel and Transportation
    • Uncommon knowledge
    • Weird cases

Blog at WordPress.com.

Theme: MistyLook by WPThemes.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Powered by WordPress.com
%d bloggers like this: